Just Your Type
The past, present, and future of personal expression through fonts
It’s possible to chart the evolution of the internet through the development of typography — from the early days when users went wild with limited default fonts, through the era of increasing standardization and cohesion, to today’s return to bespoke personalization. This essay explores how Google’s expansion of font possibilities, largelly due to the breakthrough invention of variable fonts, can bring back some of the fun things we miss about the Comic Sans era — with a little less chaos and a lot more accessibility.
The charming chaos of the early internet
Today, Web 1.0 seems like a bygone era. The pre-social media internet of the 1990s was characterized by idiosyncratic and wonky sites, with a bespoke, user-centric quality and the messiness of a scrapbook — thanks in large part to the available font selection (or lack thereof).
At the time, fonts considered web safe were those already installed on every individual user’s machine, so that they reliably looked the same on every operating system. This meant that most people could only use default options like the still-classic Times, Trebuchet, and Verdana. Creativity finds a way, however, and even these basics offered a degree of experimentation, especially when people employed color. Think of stark acid-green text on a purple background — great for a Geocities fan site, bad for a sustained reading experience.
Web design, specifically when it comes to fonts, has come a long way since those early days of the internet. Font restrictions eased up around 2009-2010 with the arrival of web fonts, supported by increased browser capability, making web-safe fonts unnecessary. While font possibilities have expanded, so has the need to streamline accessible and usable design — everyone should have access to the text on the page.
The early 2010s offered increasingly consolidated, cohesive, and modern design languages — like Apple’s flat iOS 7, Twitter’s 2012 web refresh, and Material’s launch in 2013. These systems began to establish standards in order to unify user experiences across platforms and products. Yet designers at Google were aware that these standards can risk sameness and conformity, and lose the beloved idiosyncratic or vernacular qualities endemic to the early web. So what’s a web designer with personality to do?
Increasing standardization through best practices
After the whimsy of Web 1.0, the early 2000s signaled Web 2.0’s shift to a more uniform structure and aesthetic. By the time that social media and mobile devices were introduced in the mid-2000s, designers started to bake best practices into platforms. These best practices included embracing minimalism and white space — a shift made possible by developments like responsive web design. Meanwhile, the widespread availability of web fonts melted previous restrictions away, and LED screen technology allowed for svelte, streamlined letterforms with subtler contrasts.
Google Fonts’ launch in 2010, which included a set of 18 open-source fonts, helped concretize intentional, accessible design at Google and beyond. Tobias Kunisch, co-founder of Google Fonts, says: “It was important to us to remove any barriers of entrance for good typography on the web. Back then free fonts tended to be low quality, and we wanted to change that.”
The 2014 introduction of Material 1 was driven by a keen understanding of surfaces communicated through light and shadow, with elegant and readable fonts. But even with a library of deeply considered fonts available to all, the fonts were still static, and options were largely limited to presets. In 2016, variable fonts showed a way forward.
Variable fonts and Material
Officially known as OpenType Font Variations, variable fonts allow users to choose the weight and style of a single typeface with extreme nuance, rather than relying on defaults like bold and italic. These fonts, supported by all major web browsers, drastically increase user creativity according to preference. They can be shaped through the adjustment of “axes” that control everything from weight to width — and they have practical benefits, reducing the size and number of font files. When Google, Adobe, Apple, and Microsoft announced in 2016 that they would all support variable font technology going forward, it became the new North Star — the possibility for personalization was matched with readability and cutting-edge design.
Material 2 offered support for variable fonts in its 2018 release. At that time, the Google Fonts team and Material Design teams started to partner more closely, in part to support the company’s larger design effort to infuse users’ personal styles into products through theming. And with the 2023 release of Material 3, Google radically rethought what personalized design can be — foregrounding fonts as one important way for users to express themselves.
The future of expressive fonts
The recent revival of offbeat and slightly asymmetrical forms, as seen in Material 3, suggests a broader cultural desire to rediscover the joys of DIY design — online and off. The ability to express personal choices through color and type customization lends individuality even within comprehensive, plug-and-play systems like Material. Users can become quasi-designers in the process, exerting greater control over the aesthetic systems they operate in.
“In the future, everyone will be a typographer,” says Kunisch. This is part of the beauty of variable fonts. They aren’t inflexible, static files. “We made it software,” Kunisch says of typographic design.
AI is accelerating this possibility, merging individual desires with the productive engines of Large Language Models — but the AI-produced font world is not a reality just yet. Kunisch notes that while LLMs have not yet been able to replicate the nuanced, expert capacities of human-designed fonts, the Google Fonts team sees huge opportunities for AI to help users choose and apply existing fonts and to support them in creating great typography.
The trajectory of digital fonts suggests that today’s burgeoning web era may harken back to the things we miss most about the past: the ability to build things ourselves and experiment with products, and remain true to our creativity. But we’re far from where we started. New tools will allow users to do things themselves again — but more efficiently and simply this time around.
Further reading…
“Variable Fonts Are Here to Stay,” by Dave Crossland and Laurence Penney
“One Terabyte of Kilobyte Age,” a repository of Geocities sites curated by Olia Lialina and Dragan Espenschied
“A Vernacular Web,” by Olia Lialina
“How the Web Became Unreadable,” by Kevin Marks
Filterworld: How Algorithms Flattened Culture, by Kyle Chayka
Design by Specht Studio x Google Design. Motion by Yanis Berrewaerts.